David Jackson, president of the BGSU’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors, will do everything in his power to keep the legislation from taking effect and limiting collective bargaining. The BGFA will be joining forces with other union chapters across the state to gather signatures and begin the process of forming a voter referendum, he said.
Jackson plans on “fighting the good fight” and combatting what he and other union members view as an unfair bill.
“We had a free, fair and open election (at BGSU) and we won in favor of collective bargaining,” he said. “This bill overturns that election.”
Jackson said he resents Ohio legislators for making no mention of the future attack on collective bargaining in their campaign platforms for this past November’s general election.
The BGFA and other state unions will be gathering signatures before the June 30 deadline in order to file their petition with the Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted. The referendum needs signatures from 6 percent of the voters from the gubernatorial elections from 44 counties.
And union members want every word of the bill overturned, especially the language that classifies faculty members as managers, therefore deeming them ineligible to bargain or strike.
“This language only applies to higher education union members,” Jackson said. “It’s a nasty point. If they want me to be a manager, then I’ll be a manager and I will stop doing jobs outside of the managerial role. I’d like to see them try to run this place.”
BGSU union members are not only angry with Kasich and state legislators, but also with university administrators, who have taken a supportive stance on SB5, according to Director of Marking and Communications Dave Kielmeyer.
Kielmeyer said university administrators, along with other public higher education administrators, are optimistic SB5 will save them money and keep their budget balanced without having to pay untimely faculty pay increases.
But Jackson is not convinced the university supports SB for its monetary value.
“We haven’t even seen how it will save us money,” he said. “Do they have that little faith in their negotiating team? The administration is really, really upset with us in a paternalistic way. They think they know better than we do.”
While union members may be unsure how BGSU will actually benefit financially from SB5, the state Office of Collective Bargaining calculates the legislation would have saved $1.3 billion paid out on health insurance and automatic pay raises, according to a Feb. 26 Columbus Dispatch article.
One aspect of automatic pay raises slashed by SB5 is increases for state employees with four or more years of experiences. Currently, these employees receive small pay increases for each year past four they are employed by the state.
While BGSU faculty do not receive these automatic pay hikes, SB5 will keep faculty members from demanding wage increases.
Esther Clinton, visiting assistant professor for popular culture, said this limitation would hurt experienced teachers.
“Senate Bill 5’s main goal is to cut public service workers off at the neck,” she said. “There will be things that no longer matter, like seniority for example. It would no longer be looked at when determining who stays and who goes. And we couldn’t negotiate things like class size or how many teachers we kept on staff.
“Our opinion would no longer matter.”
Ethnic studies instructor Emily Lutenski thinks the problem goes deeper than just the dollar tug of war, though. She said the battle is rooted in and underlying hostility between workers and managers.
“I think it has exposed the tension between the administration and faculty at public universities in Ohio, which I think is really unfortunate,” she said. “I feel like we should be really supportive of each other and not adversarial.”
As union members and supporters of the cause attempt to fight back against state republicans, the effort may not look like the public rallies and vocal displays outside the State House during the deliberation process.
Rather, democrats will draw upon the grassroots efforts of door-to-door petitions, phone calls and communications to combat what is being called an attack on the middle class. The BGFA is also holding a session to train volunteers.
And as Kasich continues to stick by SB5 and rally conservative support, Jackson thinks it will hurt republicans in the long run — namely, the 2012 election.
“He is damaging the republican brand in Ohio,” Jackson said. “Clearly, he didn’t want (SB5) on the ballot in 2012.”
But Kasich and republican lawmakers said SB5 will level the playing field in Ohio and allow the state to save money while creating more jobs and, thus, stimulating the economy.
Kasich said opposition to the bill is opposition to the workers of Ohio.